XIDAR Lithium–Copper Reconnaissance
AOI: 5 km × 5 km | Centre: 9.834417, 43.901250
Executive readout: the known ore coordinate falls within a credible
lithium–felsic–clay structural anomaly. The response is stronger for
lithium/pegmatite-style potential than for copper-style alteration.
Raster legends
Lithium Prospectivity
Lithium / pegmatite / clay-felsic response
LowHigh
Copper Hydrothermal
Ferric + clay/OH + gossan copper-style alteration
LowHigh
Hydrothermal Alteration
General hydrothermal alteration intensity
LowHigh
Multi-Commodity Overlap
Coincidence of Li, Cu and hydrothermal signals
LowHigh
Pegmatite / Felsic Index
Bright felsic / possible pegmatitic expression
LowHigh
Oxidized Alteration Cap
Ferric-gossan oxidation response
LowHigh
Recommended use: switch layers on one at a time. Use “Lithium Prospectivity”
and “Multi-Commodity Overlap” as the primary review layers, then compare with
pegmatite/felsic and hydrothermal context.